On Parliamentary Procedure

Liberty is the ability to do what I want, when I want, without interference, in order that some good may be accomplished. Politics is the interaction with others in an attempt to influence the outcome of events. A large part of political activity takes place in local deliberative meetings where public policy is decided.

Parliamentary procedures are the practical rules of democracy. By agreeing to abide by these rules we take the risk that the political outcome that we desire may not always come to pass. But because of our love of liberty, ours and the liberty of our fellows, we are willing to take that risk.

In her book “The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure”, Alice Sturgis says,

Parliamentary law is the procedural safeguard that protects the individual and the group in their exercise of the rights of free speech, free assembly, and the freedom to unite in organizations for the achievement of common aims. These rights, too, are meaningless, and the timeless freedoms they define can be lost, if parliamentary procedure is not observed.”

Each aspect of Robert’s Rules of order is the result of solid political reasoning, designed to ensure fairness, participation, and commitment from those in attendance. We agree to let the other person speak, listen to opinions that we may find outrageous, and to reasoning that we may consider heavily flawed. We do so because we acknowledge that every individual has a right to be heard, a right based on the intrinsic value ascribed to him or her by the living God, without whom no man or woman may claim a right to speak. In the end, our minds may be changed by what the speaker says. When we finally vote on an issue, we commit ourselves to making it happen, either by our affirmative vote, or by our respect for the association we are a part of, and of the right of the will of majority to prevail.

When a car passes by with a bumper sticker that says, “He’s not MY president”, I am angered by such treason. No matter who is elected President of the United States in November, he will be my President. I will serve and support him as far as I am able as long as he upholds and protects the Constitution of the United States, for he will have won the majority in the Electoral College, and I support the will of the majority in our constitutional republic. Yet, while there is still time, let us stand and make our voice heard for liberty, let us debate, participate according to rules of order, revel in the fact that we have a right and a process by which we may strive for our principles, for liberty to win the day.

My object in teaching parliamentary procedure is to promote liberty, and the proper use of parliamentary procedure in local deliberative bodies dedicated to the development of political and public policy. While my desire is non-partisan in nature I seek and expect lively political debate in an atmosphere of friendly cooperation. My desire is to teach others, young people in particular, the process of making political decisions, policy, and most of all progress toward the good in a democratic society through the application of Roberts Rules of Order. Certification as a registered parliamentarian is available through the National Association of Parliamentarians.

I cordially invite you to participate.

Louis William Rose

About Louis William Rose

“I am an advocate for Liberty. What I do for Liberty I do not do for profit or fame. I seek no office other than the office of parliamentarian, and no reward other than for myself and my fellow men and women to live in a free country.” Louis William Rose is a lifelong student of parliamentary procedure and political process. He has served as parliamentarian for various organizations. A political philosopher, poet, singer, and writer, his articles have been published on-line and in pro-liberty papers in Florida, Kentucky, Georgia, and Montana. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of North Florida, graduating summa cum laude in 2004, with an additional two years of graduate work in political philosophy. Mr. Rose is an outspoken supporter of the basic rights of man, especially freedom of speech, association, religion, individual rights to personal defense and property, and of republican, constitutional forms of government. He is married to the lovely Jamy Sue Rose, an award winning nature photographer and a Florida Master Naturalist and guide. He has two sons, Edward, a hydroponic farmer in the panhandle of Florida, and Alexander, a successful real estate developer.
This entry was posted in Liberty, Parliamentary Procedure, Political Theory and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply